In the former State of Bombay (now, Maharashtra and Gujarat), property inherited from a female has been held to be stridhana (Gandhi Maganlal v. Bal Jadab, 24 Bom. 192) However, the Bombay High Court has also held that if the property is inherited from a male into whose family the female entered by marriage, such property is not stridhana. (Gangadhar v. Chandrabhagabai, 17 Bom. 690)

During her maidenhood, a Hindu female could dispose of her stridhana at pleasure. If she was a minor, of course, she could do so only through her guardian.

Best services for writing your paper according to Trustpilot

Premium Partner
From $18.00 per page
4,8 / 5
4,80
Writers Experience
4,80
Delivery
4,90
Support
4,70
Price
Recommended Service
From $13.90 per page
4,6 / 5
4,70
Writers Experience
4,70
Delivery
4,60
Support
4,60
Price
From $20.00 per page
4,5 / 5
4,80
Writers Experience
4,50
Delivery
4,40
Support
4,10
Price
* All Partners were chosen among 50+ writing services by our Customer Satisfaction Team

During coverture (i.e., when she was married), a Hindu female could dispose of saudayika stridhana, i.e., gifts from relatives (as distinguished from gifts from strangers). As regards non-saudayika stridhana, i.e., gifts from strangers, as well as property earned by a woman by her own labour, the woman’s authority over such stridhana was subject to her husband’s control, although the husband enjoyed no ownership over such property.

During widowhood, a Hindu female could dispose of her stridhana (of every kind) at her pleasure, and it was immaterial whether the property was acquired before or after the husband’s death.